bullshit Archive

0

Hulu Plus A Timed Playstation 3 Exclusive?

This morning, Hulu announced plans for a paid version of their popular video streaming service entitled, “Hulu Plus.” Among the added features is the ability to access Hulu through different mobile and home theater devices.

Now, the first thing I noticed on the devices page was this large discrepancy in time between the service’s availability on the Xbox 360 and other set-top devices:

If I were a betting man, I’d certainly put some money down that Sony ponied up something fierce to have Hulu available on their game console first. It’s a big deal. Consumers have been pining for Hulu on consoles for a long time now. Sony should be coming out the huge winner in this. If I was in a monogamous relationship with the Xbox 360, I’d be pissed and wanting a PS3.

Not so if I had only read this statement from Microsoft community evangelist Major Nelson:

We are happy to announce that Hulu will be coming to Xbox LIVE as part of their Hulu Plus experience. In the announcement today, Hulu announced a preview of their Plus service, along with a series of partners of which Xbox LIVE is one of them. We’re working hard on creating customized experience for Xbox LIVE members, which means that Hulu Plus will be coming to Xbox 360 in early 2011. We are taking the time to ensure that the Hulu Plus experience for Xbox 360 is the best on TV and like our other entertainment experiences it will not be a port, but rather a custom experience that leverages the Xbox LIVE community features.

I’d be thinking, “HOLY SHIT!! Hulu coming on my Xbox 360?! And they’re making it special just for me!”

This isn’t an AAA exclusive game, folks. Since when have 3rd party services on a game console been anything but a port? It certainly won’t take over a year of additional development time to get Hulu streaming on an Xbox 360. All signs point to a timed exclusivity deal between Sony and Hulu here.

It’s amazing how effective marketing spin can be in coloring how we react to news.

2

Justice Department Opens Inquiry On Apple iTunes, Who’s Shocked?

There’s an article in yesterday’s New York Times about the Department of Justice opening an inquiry into Apple’s “bullying tactics” in digital music sales.  The biggest example given of said “bullying” was threatening the record labels if they worked with Amazon:

In March, Billboard magazine reported that Amazon was asking music labels to give it the exclusive right to sell certain forthcoming songs for one day before they went on sale more widely. In exchange, Amazon promised to include those songs in a promotion called the “MP3 Daily Deal” on its Web site.

The magazine reported that representatives of Apple’s iTunes music service were asking the labels not to participate in Amazon’s promotion, adding that Apple punished those that did by withdrawing marketing support for those songs on iTunes.

First of all, I find it deliciously ironic that the record labels are now the victims of bullying.  Secondly, is anyone actually surprised by these tactics?  Maybe I’m just jaded, but when I worked in radio implicit threats were an acceptable tool in the arsenal for record promotions.

Record Label: “If you don’t play this record by <insert new band the label is trying to break>, don’t expect to get <multiplatnium selling artist>  for your summer festival show.”

Those words were never said explicitly, but the general idea was understood.  It also worked the other way:

Radio Station: “You gave <competing station across town> an exclusive interview with <large band>? Don’t expect to get airplay for <your next baby band>.”

Tit for tat business tactics may not be the nicest or most optimal solutions, but they’re human nature.  We get wronged; we want revenge.  New girlfriend sees you talking to another chick at the bar? DOGHOUSE.  The same thing is essentially going on here with Apple, Amazon, and the record labels.

Granted, those were bygone days in which both parties had leverage on each other.  It was a symbiotic relationship; a give and take among equal powers.  Now, it seems as if Apple has all of the power here.  The record labels are so desperate for iTunes’ short-term sales that they’ll acquiesce to these types of demands and whine to Mommy (the DoJ) about it.

At the end of the day, I think this is an irrelevant battle. Inquire and regulate all you want, but you can’t change human nature. On top of this, I don’t see digital a la carte sales being the music market of the future. We’re seeing consumer excitement shift more towards cloud/subscription/social services.

But that’s a discussion for another day.

0

What Is The Rolling Stone Thinking?

I thought that terrible piece on how the Black Eyed Peas was the #1 reason to be excited about music was the most insulting thing the Rolling Stone had done to music lovers this decade.

I was wrong.

I received the above email earlier today.  Apparently, I forgot I had subscribed to The Rolling Stone (and it’s email newsletter) many years ago.  I can deal with the unwanted email; I probably should have double checked the newsletter preferences more closely.  But to squander a communication attempt with a former subscriber on this tripe?

Come on.