Movies Archive

0

George Clooney Can Predict The Future

This year’s Oscars were serviceable if uninteresting. Stewart was good, but not particularly memorable. Which, I guess, is a pretty solid performance. None of the awards got me riled up except for a slight twinge when No Country For Old Men won out over There Will Be Blood for Best Picture. Personally I thought There Will Be Blood was far and away the best picture of the year, but I’m fine with No Country For Old Men as it would have been my second choice. At least Atonement didn’t win.

What really saved my Oscar watching experience, though, was being involved in an Oscars pool. Of course I failed miserably, but it definitely made the show more interesting. Only after the fact did I discover that along with being the coolest guy on the planet, George Clooney is also an expert at picking Oscar winners.

Mein Gott. He was on the fucking dot in every category! He didn’t pick the right actresses, but he did talk about them in depth on the little blurb in that Time article.

Is there anything this man can’t do?

Read George’s picks [time.com]

2

There Will Be Blood Was Goddamn Amazing

While 2007 may have been the year of the mouthbreathing movie for me, 2008 is a different story altogether. So far, I’m batting 1.000 with the films I’ve seen in the new year. Charlie Wilson’s War, Juno, and There Will Be Blood were all great films. The latter, though, was something truly special.Contrary to what one may think (at least, my first impulse), There Will Be Blood is not about vampires or chainsaws or zombies or anything of the sort. In fact, it’s the complete opposite. The movie is an incisive look into the essence of the human spirit. It explores the darkest forms of our primal instincts. But it does so in a way that is neither gratuitous nor obvious. Throughout most of the film, I could sympathize with Daniel Plainview’s thoughts and actions. I found myself thinking like he would and started forming strategies for what he should do. Does this make me a heinous person? Maybe. Or maybe that’s simply what human nature is. When you watch the film, you can arrive at your own conclusions on the actions of the protagonist. A word of caution though: be prepared to actively watch and analyze.Not to suggest that you are too stupid for the movie, but the film does not hold your hand. It’s not a rollercoaster ride. It’s not a clown, getting in your face and trying to entertain you. It’s more like a self-indulgent, yet fascinating professor giving a lecture while not pausing to take questions or making sure you are following along. I’ll be up front and say that this is a long movie. Two hours and forty-five minutes long. If you’re in the mood for pew pew lasers or fart jokes, please wait until your brain cells are working again before you go see There Will Be Blood.

What makes this movie so good then? Each of its major contributors does his job magnificently. Daniel Day-Lewis’s performance is simply unparalleled. The man is in virtually every scene of the film and he absolutely fucking KILLS it. It’s the performance of his life, and probably of a generation as well. Paul Thomas-Anderson’s direction is magnificent. Not one line of dialog is unnecessary or forced. In fact, every verbal exchange has extreme gravitas. The landscapes and camera angles PTA employs are utterly breathtaking and unique. I’ve never seen a PTA movie before, but you can bet your sweet behind I will go through his filmography now. Finally, Radiohead’s own Jonny Greenwood composes a score that is surprisingly apropos and gripping. The film begins with a string crescendo that swells and swells until it becomes an almost shrieking cacophony. You want to avert your ears but you can’t. You’re forced to bear with it until it subsides. This is Daniel Plainview’s theme and it mirrors his soul perfectly. He does some truly deplorable things that you know are plain wrong, but you can’t ignore his actions.

Normally I hate period pieces, because they just bore me to death. Not this film, though. It fascinated me. I’m glad I got myself in the right frame of mind to see There Will Be Blood, because this was just a simply stunning work of art. I almost wish I was in film study because there’s just so much to talk about and analyze here, even days after viewing the movie.

That’s the mark of a truly great film.

I’m not the only one to feel this way either. This is a movie that is universally considered to be a masterpiece.

If I had seen this last year, it would have definitely vied for a top spot in my entertainment experiences list. An amazing achievement in film making.

3

Individual 2007 Top Ten Lists

Indulge me as I’m in a list making mood. After the jump I’ll list my lists. They’ll include top tens for music, comics, video games, movies, and television shows. Since I’m too burnt out now to write something for each entry, I won’t. I’ll be happy to conduct a civilized conversation in the comments or email though. Oh, and the lists will contain only things I have experienced in ’07. Stuff I didn’t get to until after the new year, but released near the end of last year (e.g. There Will Be Blood) will go on next year’s lists.
Read the rest of this entry »

2

Top Ten Entertainment Experiences Of 2007

2007 was pretty lopsided for me in terms of where my quality entertainment experiences came from. It was a phenomenal year for video games. Perhaps the best single year of new releases for the medium since 1997, if not better. Conversely, there just wasn’t much there in terms of great music. Some solid releases, sure, but nothing that remain etched in my mind as transcendent. Live shows definitely resonated better for me than the album experience did. For sports, I’ll preface my conclusion by saying that I only regularly follow the MLB, the NFL, and the NBA. Besides the lone entry on the list, there were no other truly memorable moments for me this year. Television was fairly solid, despite the writers strike putting a damper on my mood late in the year. Comics had some pretty high moments, and also some pretty “meh” ones as well. Finally, 2007 was just not my year for movies as I wasn’t motivated to seek out much other than the obvious films. While some were fairly entertaining, I just couldn’t argue for their inclusion on this list over the items picked.

Without any more ado, here’s my top ten entertainment experiences of 2007:
Read the rest of this entry »

2

Warner Bros Leaves HD DVD For Blu-Ray

Last Friday, Warner Bros. Entertainment announced that they would become exclusive to the Blu-ray disc format by May of 2008, leaving those in the HD DVD camp high and dry.  Warners has been the only “format neutral” major studio for awhile now, although there have been many Warner Bros. movies that were essentially HD DVD exclusive (Batman Begins comes to mind) because of feature discrepancies between Blu-ray and HD DVD.

Gizmodo has a paraphrased interview with Warner Home Entertainment president Kevin Tsujihara on why Warners made the switch:

Kevin Tsujihara told us that what was “somewhat troubling” is the “impact consumer confusion was starting to have” on regular DVD. “Consumers were saying ‘Hey, I might was well wait.'” If another studio had switched “it could have possibly impacted” Warner’s decision. Tsujihara said he “can’t anticipate” the other studios moving over to HD DVD “given the numbers that are out there.”

By choosing a side, Warner Bros. has tilted the balance of power significantly towards the Blu-ray camp in terms of studio clout.  Only Paramount/Dreamworks and Universal remain exclusive to HD DVD.  Granted, these are HUGE studios with a significant chunk of content that everyone wants to watch.  In fact, there is enough content between them that I’m about to purchase an HD DVD player myself, despite already owning a Blu-ray player AND in spite of this recent announcement from Warner Bros.

Looking at the big picture, the real reason anyone buys these next-gen movie players is because they want to see movies in high definition.  Without getting into technology spec bickering, both formats are essentially the same to the end-user.  Unlike the different game consoles, there are no huge compelling feature differences to pick one format over the other.  It simply boils down to “Is the movie I want to see released in Blu-ray or HD DVD.”

(As an aside: let me tell you, if you have an HD TV and you have any interest in watching movies, you need to procure one of these devices ASAP.  The quality difference between standard DVDs and hi-def discs on a HD TV is so palpable it makes anyone question how they ever watched movies in such excrement in the past.)

Tsujihara is right in that all this “format war” has done is alienate customers and sow confusion and discontent among the masses.  I applaud Warner Bros. for doing what they can to push the industry to a standard hi-def movie format.  But in all honesty, I wouldn’t be surprised if both formats co-existed for a couple of more years.  That is why I’m taking the plunge and buying an Xbox 360 HD-DVD player to complement my PS3’s Blu-ray capability.  Stand alone low-end HD DVD players can be had from the low $100s nowadays.  Couple this with a $399 Playstation 3 and you have the capability to play every hi-def movie on the market now and in the future.  You’re looking at a roughly $550 expenditure and you get a gaming system to boot.  This is lower than buying one of the combo players on the market.  Yes, $550 is a chunk of change, but for those of us who can afford hi-def televisions in the first place, spending a fraction of that on one of the main reasons you bought that expensive TV in the first place starts to make sense.  Not to mention, just one year ago, owning both format players would have cost you from $1500-$2000.

So what if my $100 HD-DVD player goes the way of Betamax in a year or two.  In an age of ephemeral home electronics devices, a two year lifespan for a $100 device may even sound good.

Read the press release [timewarner.com]